Class Opener – Day 46 – Correlation Does NOT Mean Causation!

Today’s class opener comes from my Advanced Placement Statistics class, but provides an important lesson for stats students of all ages.  A timeplot featuring two interesting data sets, and their changes over time is featured as students enter:

correlation-does-not-imply-causation

That’s quite a high r value we have for two variables, autism diagnoses and organic food sales, which would not seem so closely related. In conversation with the class we discussed the importance of clear communication, and how this article could easily be summarized and misinterpreted by our local newspaper:

ORGANIC FOOD CAUSES AUTISM, RESEARCH SHOWS

Uh oh….we have a problem.  And not an uncommon problem, as scientific studies which find correlations between variables are often misinterpreted as cause-effect studies.  The fun site Spurious Correlations by Tyler Vigen provides some wild examples of variables with strong (sometimes eerliy strong) correlations to help frame discussions.  Some fun examples –

  • Divorce rate in Maine correlates with Per capita consumption of margarine (US)
  • Worldwide non-commercial space launches correlates with Sociology doctorates awarded (US)
  • Per capita consumption of chicken (US) correlates with Total US crude oil imports

Later, my students will be asked to read and respond to a “newspaper article” about a California school which analyzed their student data and found that student achievement correlates strongly to student height.  The school’s reaction to this correlation seems dubious at best, and with good reason….it’s a fictitious article I wrote symobolize the danger of seeking cause/effect from casual relationships.

Advertisements

3 responses to “Class Opener – Day 46 – Correlation Does NOT Mean Causation!

  1. I rather like : Diagnosis of autism in child causes parents to become health food addicts ($100,000 per year per family)

  2. Pingback: Chainsaw Review of How to Lie with Statistics, Part II | Chainsaw Communications

  3. Pingback: Book Review: How to Lie with Statistics, Part II | Chainsaw Communications

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s