Categories
Class Openers

Class Opener – Day 61 – Slicing the Cake

Today’s class started with a review of laws of exponents, including negative exponents. I like to send students up to boards often in class, and sometimes use a deck of cards to have students determine their fate. There are 3 large boards in my room, and those who drew Aces, twos and threes were each directed to a board – 3 at each board. Before I began to bark out problems, it’s time to claim our space –

Split the board into 3 parts so that each person has an equitable space.

This was no problem for most teams, as there is always someone willing to take control and draw big, vertical lines down the board. But you can easily determine the trios which had more than one “type A” personality, as erasing sabotage, arguing, and even boxing-out occurred to just split up the board….they’re freshmen….

After the first group of students had completed their problems, the fours, fives and sixes then went to the board. Remembering some lessons from a Contemporary Math class I had taught at Rowan University a few years back, this seemed like a great time to expose students to the divider-chooser method for fair division. And while we are splitting up a board, this would be ideal for splitting up a cake, land, or other assets.  Here are the instructions:

  • In your team of 3, assign roles of player 1, player 2 and player 3.
  • Player 1 – approach the board and divide it into 2 “fair” pieces, without help from the others.
  • Player 2 – choose one of the 2 pieces to claim as your own. Player 1 now owns the other piece. Both players should stand in fron of their pieces.
  • Players 1 and 2 – divide your area into 3 “fair” pieces.
  • Player 3 – choose 1 slice from the areas of players 1 and 2 to claim as yours.
  • Each player now has 2 “equitable” pieces.

Sometimes it’s fun to do 5 minutes of a math nugget they may never see again, but it’s worth the discussion it generates. It was interesting to see how some players chose to work horizontally, rather than vertically – and we even had a triangular arrangement (seen below). But these aren’t really practical for doing exponent problems, so we eventually went back to a traditional division.

North Carolina State provides a helpful file which summarizes a number of fair-division methods, including the Lone Chooser method for 3 people, and you can also easily search “Fair Division Methods” to find more interesting ways to divide assets.

boards

Categories
Class Openers Statistics

Class Opener – Day 60 – Herding the Cats

After a wonderful Thanksgiving break (made more wonderful by the Eagles win over the Cowboys!), it’s the 3-week sprint to the holidays, followed by 2 full weeks before final exams.  There’s a lot of stopping and starting going on, which doesn’t help continuity when thinking about class content.  In my AP Stats class, we are deep into our unit on experimental design, which is filled with ideas, terms and arguments must different than a traditional math class. Groups are working through their “Old Wives’ Tales” project, and after grading some student responses this weekend I need an opener which brings the whole class back into the Stats circle. My friend Glenn Waddell has some awesome resources for statistics on his website, which provided inspiration for today’s opener – a short video from ABC News featuring the placebo effect.

http://abcnews.go.com/video/embed?id=19850208
More ABC US news | ABC World News

For today’s opener, I asked students to design an experiment which could prove (or disprove) the efficacy of the WYFFT “energy drink”.  This gave groups much to talk about, and a thorough discussion of elements of experimental design, including:

  • Treatments: WYFFT is not a “real” drink, it’s just soda. Students conjectured that the labeling and associated signage were the actual treatment. We can compare this vs a plain bottle, or against no drink at all.
  • Matched-Pairs: could subjects plausibly participate in both treatments? Is this reasionable?
  • Blocking: could the implied reaction be different in men than in women? Perhaps we should have two different experiments?
  • Response: what exactly are we measuring? What would be a suitable activity to measure a change in energy?
  • Randomization: how will subects be selected for the treatments?

And we are off and running after a long turkey-induced rest!

Categories
Class Openers

Class Opener – Day 55(?) – Can We Just “Guess and Check”?

I’m a little off schedule with the class openers lately, so we’ll call this one day 55. There have been a few schedule disruptions here at school, and I was out yesterday – presenting on Standards Based Grading in Algebra 1 at the PASCD conference – on top of all of that, the dog ate my homework…..OK, enough excuses!  Today really isn’t a class opener, but rather a summary of some goings-on related to math persistence – those times when you give your students a problem which will require more than a one-time effort, and observe their response.


PosterJon Orr, a teacher from Ontario,  shared the poster shown here on twitter, and I love it! If you aren’t following Jon, do it now, and be sure to check out his blog with lots of great classroom ideas, mostly for Algebra 1.

When I was out yesterday, my students had two tasks to complete: work through problems as review for their quiz on matrices today, and complete a “problem solving” task involving matrices. In the task, which you can download here, students are asked to find a matrix which is its own inverse, with a few restrictions.

One team today submitted a paper which did find what was requested, but left me uneasy:

2014-11-25_0001

The group clearly found a matrix which is its own inverse, but am I confident that they could generalize and perhaps find more? And are those “random numbers” they started off with actually random, or do they signify the end of a process which has not been communicated? I find that this is typical of a problem-solving process for many students – begin with some “random” numbers and hope that they lead towards a fruitful path.  Hey, what’s the matter with good old “guess and check”, if the question at hand is answered? I don’t have a problem with this “brute force” method IF the process leads to a generalization, which this paper did not. I struggle with having my students move from “I got an answer” and towards “hey, now I see how this REALLY works”.  All is not lost, however, as some students thought about variables and attempted to generalize, but then opted to plug and chug.

2014-11-25_0002

I’m looking forward to the group conversations we will have in the coming days surrounding this problem.

Tonight for homework I assigned a problem involving a wire being streched around the earth. Within 60 seconds the first all familiar call was heard: “I don’t know what to do!”.  A sly smile from me and pointing out today’s quote sent the message that this cry wouldn’t get them off easy…it’s a hard-fought battle to get kids to move past theiur initial blockades and think.