Categories
Algebra

Why is “Simplify” So Damn Complicated?

Making my classroom rounds this week, I came across a class reviewing concepts for the upcoming Pennsylvania Keystone Exams in Alegebra 1.  The PA Department of Education provides an eligible contect document with sample items on its website, and the class was working on the following question:

Item

Pretty standard problem.  Factor the numerator and denominator, cancel common factors, and you’re home.  But this class was struggling with the factoring review, so I stepped in with a different approach.  How about taking the given expression, and using a graphing calculator to evaluate it?  Sadly, the class was not familiar with the Table on their TI-84’s, but understood what it did right away:

Calc 1

Some nice discussions emerge here.  What’s with that “error”?  Is our calculator broken?  And some evidence over this function’s behavior emerges.  Note the slowly increasing values of y.

But how does this help us with the question at hand?  A number of students recognized that the correct answer would be the expression which had the same Y-values.  In essence, simplfying produces a different-looking expression with the same outputs as the original.  So, let’s try the answer choices.  Here’s A:

Calc 2

No dice.  Values are much different.  And a fantastic opportunity to discuss the difference between an output of zero, and an undefined output.  But eventually we get to D, and can check the tables:

Calc 3

Looks pretty good, butttt……..what’s with the errors?  And they seem different for some inputs.  But now we can review and discuss domain, and look at those pesky domain restrictions in a new light.

So, am I a bad person for bypassing the factoring review, and encouraging calculator use?  After the discussion, I reminded the class that factoring is a skill they need to have in their toolbox, but the alternate discussion of equivalent forms and assessing values was also worthwhile.  I feel good.


This classroom visit got me thinking about the nature of the word “simplify” in math class.  How often do we ask students to “simplify” in math class, and in what contexts?

Sometimes we want to simplify an expression:

Or maybe we want to simplify a rational expression:

Or perhaps we want so simplify a radical expression:

And make sure you simplify when there is a radical in the denominator (unless you are taking AP Calc, in which case we don’t care about such silliness)

For different situations, we have subtle differences in what it means to simplify, but is there a common goal of simplifying?  Is it just to make things look pretty?    And is a simplified expression always the most useful?  When is it not?

I’m curious if anyone has a short and snappy answer to “what does it mean to simplify an expression?”.  I invite you to participate and contribute your response on Todays Meet (click to participate).  If you have never used Today’s Meet, it is a nice, free way to gather responses.  Simply provide the link and start a conversation!  Feel free to share the link with your students a “bell ringer” activity.  If we get some responses, I’ll make a later blog post about them.

TodaysMeet

Categories
Uncategorized

Last Night at Global Math….

Thanks to Megan Hayes-Golding for hosting last night’s session at the Global Math Department, where I shared some of my Tall Tales for Probability.  The recording is now available.  This was my second time presenting, and it is a unique experience.  I recognize that I talk WAY too fast at times, mostly because I am so excited to share my ideas.  But sitting alone on the couch talking to my laptop, and trying to assess reactions in the chat room make online speaking a wild ride.  I was the 2nd speaker of the evening, and enjoyed Chris Harrow‘s sharing the 4’s Game, and Chris Hunter‘s ideas for cooperative learning.  Always an uplifting experience to be around such excellent educators!

I had a few requests for the video of the hay bales.  I have put it on dropbox, but it is a BIG file.  Let me know if I need to zip it.

Categories
Statistics

The Case of “Too Many Powerball Winners”

Here’s a favorite activity of mine from prob/stat class.  I love bringing in real stories of statistical improbability from the media to get kids thinking about real-world applications of probability, and reinforce the fact that theoretical probability represents a long-term ratio.  In the short term, funky stuff happens sometimes.  In an earlier post, I gave some examples from the Amazing Race and the casino world.  Today’s example comes from another gambling example: Powerball.

First, some understanding of the game is required.  In Powerball, players attempt to guess the numbers that wil be drawn from ping-pong ball machines.  Two different machines are used for the game.  In the first machine, there are 59 white balls, while a second machine holds red balls numbered 1-35.

Powerball

Players select 5 numbers they believe will be drawn from the white-ball machine, and 1 number they believe will be drawn from the red-ball machine.  If you match all 6 numbers correctly, you win the grand prize, often in the 10’s of millions of dollars.  For more info on the game and how to play, the Powerball website provides lots of info, including a rather amusing FAQ area.  You can also use random.org to generate some draws, play the game with your class, and hopefully show them how difficult Powerball is to win, or even get 2 numbers correct.

THE TABLE HAS BEEN SET, NOW FOR THE MAIN COURSE

Print out the first page of this file, which is an article from the Washington Post, with key information removed.  Don’t give out the second page – it contains the secret to this probability anomoly.  You can read the article on your own, but here is a summary of the article:

  • If a player matches all 5 white balls in a Powerball drawing, but not the red ball, they win a prize of $100,000.
  • In a given week, there are “usually” 4 or 5 such winners.
  • On a drawing in 2005, there were 110 winners.
  • The Powerball police investigated.

What caused so many winners?  Cheating?  Luck?  Pure chance?  Are the winning numbers “special” in any way?  In Pennsylvania’s Daily Number, for example, the state pays has paid out more than 5 times the amount wagered when the 7-7-7 combination is drawn.

The second page of the article gives away the surprising twist, after students think about the situation, and make some conjectures.  So what’s the twist?

Spoiler space….if you want to think so more…do it now….

 

 

More spoiler space…..

 

 

Ready….it’s fortune cookies!

Fortune Cookies!

A company in Queens, NY produces fortune cookies for restaurants, and chooses numbers to go on the fortunes.  They seem to use the same numbers in a batch, and these numbers found their way into the hands of hungry Chinese-food lovers, who played the numbers.  They just happened to hit!

Hope you enjoy this tale of statistical improbability!